<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Presidential Race Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com</link>
	<description>Discussing the next Presidential election, the candidates, and Parties</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 02:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The CNN/Tea Party Republican Debate by Steve Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2011/09/13/the-cnntea-party-republican-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-43896</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 01:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/?p=443#comment-43896</guid>
		<description>Watching the debates has been extremely painful this year as the candidates are just on outright attack against each other.  Now we have all of the negative ads blasting Newt and the other candidates.  Shouldn't this kind of politics be left to the Democrats in the general election?  Are all the GOP candidates on the "same team"?  

Why start pointing out all the bad stuff now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the debates has been extremely painful this year as the candidates are just on outright attack against each other.  Now we have all of the negative ads blasting Newt and the other candidates.  Shouldn&#8217;t this kind of politics be left to the Democrats in the general election?  Are all the GOP candidates on the &#8220;same team&#8221;?  </p>
<p>Why start pointing out all the bad stuff now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Perry ranch proof of racism? Or opportunistic political diversion? by skottler15</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2011/10/02/perry-ranch-proof-of-racism-or-opportunistic-political-diversion/comment-page-1/#comment-39610</link>
		<dc:creator>skottler15</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 23:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/?p=447#comment-39610</guid>
		<description>I think that it is ridiculous that this name was the name of this place for so long.  It is very irresponsible of the Perry family to keep the name as long as they did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is ridiculous that this name was the name of this place for so long.  It is very irresponsible of the Perry family to keep the name as long as they did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Video - Republican debate, the end for Rep Ron Paul and Gov. Rick Perry? by Robert the Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2011/09/13/video-republican-debate-the-end-for-rep-ron-paul-and-gov-rick-perry/comment-page-1/#comment-38775</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert the Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/?p=445#comment-38775</guid>
		<description>I have long since wondered if Ron Paul can't (and probably won't) win because everyone continues to say that he can't.  I'm not saying he's the best candidates I just don't think that he gets a fair shake sometimes.

I'm still on the fence of which Republican Candidate I'm going to support but it's shaping up to be an interesting race!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have long since wondered if Ron Paul can&#8217;t (and probably won&#8217;t) win because everyone continues to say that he can&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m not saying he&#8217;s the best candidates I just don&#8217;t think that he gets a fair shake sometimes.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still on the fence of which Republican Candidate I&#8217;m going to support but it&#8217;s shaping up to be an interesting race!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How do the Republican Presidential candidates rank right now by PatrioticPirate</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2011/08/10/how-do-the-republican-presidential-candidates-rank-right-now/comment-page-1/#comment-36841</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrioticPirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 01:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/?p=419#comment-36841</guid>
		<description>I think it's absolutely astonishing that people are even thinking about the 2012 elections right now. Obama is turning our country into a fascist nation (Not Communist, rather National Socialist). His Debt deal was made in collusion with foreign powers, namely Lord David Beers of Standard and Whores, his war in Libya is in violation of Article 1 Section 8 and promotes the perpetual war doctrine of R2P (responsibility to protect a.k.a. Governance over the US military power) and he has intervened on criminal investigations of BofA and BNY Mellon by removing Schneiderman for heading up the investigations, obstruction of justice?... Instead of protecting our nations founding doctrines the conservatives of today use these misgivings to push a candidate in the elections.. I think that would mean that they are committing treason by allowing it. It's been long over due that people who claim to be against Obama do more than slap a bumper sticker on their pick-up truck and have impotent conversations with their buddies about how Obama is a muslim. If you wish to have a 2012 election REMOVE OBAMA before we go down with the Titanic called the Trans-Atlantic Monetary System which has more holes in the hull than we can plug up with worthless fed dollars. Wake up and fight for the country as if you realize what it took for our forefathers to secure this republic!

I think whether you want to admit it or not you should listen to the wise words of the LaRouche PAC on Policy and a way out of this crisis because it won't be as simple as cutting the budget and deporting the immigrants believe it or not. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s absolutely astonishing that people are even thinking about the 2012 elections right now. Obama is turning our country into a fascist nation (Not Communist, rather National Socialist). His Debt deal was made in collusion with foreign powers, namely Lord David Beers of Standard and Whores, his war in Libya is in violation of Article 1 Section 8 and promotes the perpetual war doctrine of R2P (responsibility to protect a.k.a. Governance over the US military power) and he has intervened on criminal investigations of BofA and BNY Mellon by removing Schneiderman for heading up the investigations, obstruction of justice?&#8230; Instead of protecting our nations founding doctrines the conservatives of today use these misgivings to push a candidate in the elections.. I think that would mean that they are committing treason by allowing it. It&#8217;s been long over due that people who claim to be against Obama do more than slap a bumper sticker on their pick-up truck and have impotent conversations with their buddies about how Obama is a muslim. If you wish to have a 2012 election REMOVE OBAMA before we go down with the Titanic called the Trans-Atlantic Monetary System which has more holes in the hull than we can plug up with worthless fed dollars. Wake up and fight for the country as if you realize what it took for our forefathers to secure this republic!</p>
<p>I think whether you want to admit it or not you should listen to the wise words of the LaRouche PAC on Policy and a way out of this crisis because it won&#8217;t be as simple as cutting the budget and deporting the immigrants believe it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leading Democratic candidates Pros and Cons by living social</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-35678</link>
		<dc:creator>living social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/#comment-35678</guid>
		<description>I really appreciate this post. I have been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You've made my day! Thx again! "All that is gold does not glitter not all those that wander are lost." by J. R. R. Tolkien.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really appreciate this post. I have been looking everywhere for this! Thank goodness I found it on Bing. You&#8217;ve made my day! Thx again! &#8220;All that is gold does not glitter not all those that wander are lost.&#8221; by J. R. R. Tolkien.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leading Democratic candidates Pros and Cons by Tactical Gun Dealer</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-35406</link>
		<dc:creator>Tactical Gun Dealer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 22:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/#comment-35406</guid>
		<description>Hello, You make great use of your words in this article. I am impressed with the valid points of interest you make here and I agree. I have considered starting a blog myself. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, You make great use of your words in this article. I am impressed with the valid points of interest you make here and I agree. I have considered starting a blog myself. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leading Democratic candidates Pros and Cons by Shotgun</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-35062</link>
		<dc:creator>Shotgun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/#comment-35062</guid>
		<description>It goes without saying I will tell all my friends about it, extremely effective. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It goes without saying I will tell all my friends about it, extremely effective. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Leading Democratic candidates Pros and Cons by naruto</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-35019</link>
		<dc:creator>naruto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/29/leading-democratic-candidates-pros-and-cons/#comment-35019</guid>
		<description>Pretty decent post. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to say that I have in reality enjoyed reading your web site posts. Any way I'll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty decent post. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to say that I have in reality enjoyed reading your web site posts. Any way I&#8217;ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The lies Presidential candidates say, and the facts that prove it by Video clips of candidate flips: Polispeak in action Part 2 &#124; VASS political blog</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/22/the-lies-presidential-candidates-say-and-the-facts-that-prove-it/comment-page-1/#comment-32604</link>
		<dc:creator>Video clips of candidate flips: Polispeak in action Part 2 &#124; VASS political blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 05:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/22/the-lies-presidential-candidates-say-and-the-facts-that-prove-it/#comment-32604</guid>
		<description>[...] The election for 2008 is very important. Many critical issues affecting America for the next decade are in play. Essentially it seems that this election will come down to the lesser of 2 evils, which still leaves us with an evil. But given that, keep in mind when you go to the primaries that virtually every Presidential candidate has lied, answered in the grey, or outright taken both sides ... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The election for 2008 is very important. Many critical issues affecting America for the next decade are in play. Essentially it seems that this election will come down to the lesser of 2 evils, which still leaves us with an evil. But given that, keep in mind when you go to the primaries that virtually every Presidential candidate has lied, answered in the grey, or outright taken both sides &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The hurdles to an Obama-Biden re-election in 2012 by The hurdles to an Obama-Biden re-election in 2012 &#124; Presidential &#8230; &#124; Obama Biden 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2011/05/31/the-hurdles-to-an-obama-biden-re-election-in-2012/comment-page-1/#comment-32544</link>
		<dc:creator>The hurdles to an Obama-Biden re-election in 2012 &#124; Presidential &#8230; &#124; Obama Biden 2012</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 08:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/?p=403#comment-32544</guid>
		<description>[...] started. Which means that political strategists are &#8230; &#8230;   Go here to see the original: The hurdles to an Obama-Biden re-election in 2012 &#124; Presidential &#8230;     &#8592; Allen West Unveils New Criticism of Obama, Dismisses Talk of &#8230; Tears of a Clown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] started. Which means that political strategists are &#8230; &#8230;   Go here to see the original: The hurdles to an Obama-Biden re-election in 2012 | Presidential &#8230;     &#8592; Allen West Unveils New Criticism of Obama, Dismisses Talk of &#8230; Tears of a Clown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carl E. Heastie, NY State Assemblyman - up for re-election by Michael Vass</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/comment-page-1/#comment-17633</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 17:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/#comment-17633</guid>
		<description>While I am interested in seeing replies to my post, I will no longer allow comments directly advocating another politician. I will allow those that have been appoved, but no more.

The reason is becuase this does not address my post.

I am troubled by why Assemblyman Heastie did not follow through with our interview. I am concerned that there was some reason that he backed out. And in a year since that planned interview not one member of his staff has bothered to contact me.

Any politician that acts in such a manner concerns me. People advocating another official does not answer my concerns. It does not state that any other politician is better, or answer any of the questions I have.

I want to know if Assemblyman Heastie has done his job. Do voters have concerns like my own. Are they aware of the answers to my questions, and do they have any of their own?

If Alan J Gerson wishes to have an interview with me, he can reach me at info@vassconsult.com

But piggybacking on a post about another politician, withot addressing the issues in that post, does not confer any greater trust or reason to vote for that politician in my mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I am interested in seeing replies to my post, I will no longer allow comments directly advocating another politician. I will allow those that have been appoved, but no more.</p>
<p>The reason is becuase this does not address my post.</p>
<p>I am troubled by why Assemblyman Heastie did not follow through with our interview. I am concerned that there was some reason that he backed out. And in a year since that planned interview not one member of his staff has bothered to contact me.</p>
<p>Any politician that acts in such a manner concerns me. People advocating another official does not answer my concerns. It does not state that any other politician is better, or answer any of the questions I have.</p>
<p>I want to know if Assemblyman Heastie has done his job. Do voters have concerns like my own. Are they aware of the answers to my questions, and do they have any of their own?</p>
<p>If Alan J Gerson wishes to have an interview with me, he can reach me at <a href="mailto:info@vassconsult.com">info@vassconsult.com</a></p>
<p>But piggybacking on a post about another politician, withot addressing the issues in that post, does not confer any greater trust or reason to vote for that politician in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carl E. Heastie, NY State Assemblyman - up for re-election by john</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/comment-page-1/#comment-17599</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/#comment-17599</guid>
		<description>yeah,he is a promising leader.vote for him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah,he is a promising leader.vote for him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carl E. Heastie, NY State Assemblyman - up for re-election by mark.ny00</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/comment-page-1/#comment-17598</link>
		<dc:creator>mark.ny00</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 16:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/#comment-17598</guid>
		<description>ccording to me for ny he is the best man we can ever get he is a native of our state and we cant forget whatever he has done to us..chek this link if u want to refer..http://www.gerson2009.com/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&amp;screenKey=cmpContent&amp;htmlKey=about&amp;s=gerson..
thank you..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ccording to me for ny he is the best man we can ever get he is a native of our state and we cant forget whatever he has done to us..chek this link if u want to refer..http://www.gerson2009.com/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&amp;screenKey=cmpContent&amp;htmlKey=about&amp;s=gerson..<br />
thank you..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carl E. Heastie, NY State Assemblyman - up for re-election by tom</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/comment-page-1/#comment-17594</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/#comment-17594</guid>
		<description>do vote for him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>do vote for him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carl E. Heastie, NY State Assemblyman - up for re-election by Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/comment-page-1/#comment-17593</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/#comment-17593</guid>
		<description>Alan J Gerson had done much for PROGRESS OF NEW YORK
Those can be read from the link : http://www.gerson2009.com/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&amp;screenKey=cmpContent&amp;htmlKey=issues&amp;s=gerson
i think people will consider his activities for the coming council election on Sept 15th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan J Gerson had done much for PROGRESS OF NEW YORK<br />
Those can be read from the link : <a href="http://www.gerson2009.com/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&amp;screenKey=cmpContent&amp;htmlKey=issues&amp;s=gerson" rel="nofollow">http://www.gerson2009.com/main.cfm?actionId=globalShowStaticContent&amp;screenKey=cmpContent&amp;htmlKey=issues&amp;s=gerson</a><br />
i think people will consider his activities for the coming council election on Sept 15th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The most serious issue from the recent Democratic debate by Horch</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/02/the-most-serious-issue-from-the-recent-democratic-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-7093</link>
		<dc:creator>Horch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2007/11/02/the-most-serious-issue-from-the-recent-democratic-debate/#comment-7093</guid>
		<description>If we cannot trust one issue can any be considered correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we cannot trust one issue can any be considered correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on M V Consulting, Inc. election poll results by 5el</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/11/06/m-v-consulting-inc-election-poll-results/comment-page-1/#comment-6133</link>
		<dc:creator>5el</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/11/06/m-v-consulting-inc-election-poll-results/#comment-6133</guid>
		<description>52% overall for President Obama :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>52% overall for President Obama <img src='http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Carl E. Heastie, NY State Assemblyman - up for re-election by Panicasse</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/comment-page-1/#comment-6013</link>
		<dc:creator>Panicasse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/28/carl-e-heastie-ny-state-assemblyman-up-for-re-election/#comment-6013</guid>
		<description>Hey ppl, i've conclude www.presidentialraceblog.com when i searched &lt;a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;google&lt;/a&gt;
 for a absolved and salutary forum, and i carry out to loiter here)
if you note my english crap... so be it, i'm de jure learning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey ppl, i&#8217;ve conclude <a href="http://www.presidentialraceblog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com</a> when i searched <a href="http://google.com" rel="nofollow">google</a><br />
 for a absolved and salutary forum, and i carry out to loiter here)<br />
if you note my english crap&#8230; so be it, i&#8217;m de jure learning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How does media bias affect Presidential election by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/22/how-does-media-bias-affect-presidential-election/comment-page-1/#comment-4261</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/22/how-does-media-bias-affect-presidential-election/#comment-4261</guid>
		<description>David, 

Yes I am a Republican. If you have read my posts I have said so many times. And if you have read my posts, independent research reports, and the admissions of several news agencies themselves you will note that the media bias in favor of President Obama was widespread. To comment on fact is not partisan.

In addition I made no promise or implication that I would not favor a particular Presidential candidate. I have stated in posts several times that I supported Senator McCain.

But the big question should be why. What policies made me believe I should vote Republican. Because I do not favor blind partisanship. And in that I believe I have always done well. Unlike the major media I have discussed the pros and cons of every candidate, and my opinion of those factors. Unlike the media I admitted I could be wrong, or that my readers may favor another candidate. And unlike the media I openly promoted voters to vote for whomever they believed it.

I just asked them to be aware of the policies they would be voting in.

So no I don't believe that I was so partisan as to "have a warm feeling in my legs" and other such pro-Obama hype. And I did pay attention to the multiple gaffes and contradictory comments of Vice President Biden. And I mentioned the conflict that exists in the Obama Administration - as I see it so far. And I mentioned the most probable consequences of each candidates platforms.

This election was a comment on the current President. It was a statement of fear - economic fear. And it was the biggest kick in the ass the media has given the public since yellow journalism. The media failed to present facts and events, or ask questions that voters had questions on. I expect the media hopes to gain something from this massive corporate support. I recieved noting but readers and comments.

I can live with that. But did you find my commentary to be inaccurate, unfair, or overly biased? Did I promote a candidate to the detriment of facts and events? Did I unfairly present a candidate as to alter votes on a misrepresentation?

I ask that honestly because I always want to know what my readers think. So far most believed me to be accurate if a bit harsh. And in an election, especially for President, I think that is just right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, </p>
<p>Yes I am a Republican. If you have read my posts I have said so many times. And if you have read my posts, independent research reports, and the admissions of several news agencies themselves you will note that the media bias in favor of President Obama was widespread. To comment on fact is not partisan.</p>
<p>In addition I made no promise or implication that I would not favor a particular Presidential candidate. I have stated in posts several times that I supported Senator McCain.</p>
<p>But the big question should be why. What policies made me believe I should vote Republican. Because I do not favor blind partisanship. And in that I believe I have always done well. Unlike the major media I have discussed the pros and cons of every candidate, and my opinion of those factors. Unlike the media I admitted I could be wrong, or that my readers may favor another candidate. And unlike the media I openly promoted voters to vote for whomever they believed it.</p>
<p>I just asked them to be aware of the policies they would be voting in.</p>
<p>So no I don&#8217;t believe that I was so partisan as to &#8220;have a warm feeling in my legs&#8221; and other such pro-Obama hype. And I did pay attention to the multiple gaffes and contradictory comments of Vice President Biden. And I mentioned the conflict that exists in the Obama Administration - as I see it so far. And I mentioned the most probable consequences of each candidates platforms.</p>
<p>This election was a comment on the current President. It was a statement of fear - economic fear. And it was the biggest kick in the ass the media has given the public since yellow journalism. The media failed to present facts and events, or ask questions that voters had questions on. I expect the media hopes to gain something from this massive corporate support. I recieved noting but readers and comments.</p>
<p>I can live with that. But did you find my commentary to be inaccurate, unfair, or overly biased? Did I promote a candidate to the detriment of facts and events? Did I unfairly present a candidate as to alter votes on a misrepresentation?</p>
<p>I ask that honestly because I always want to know what my readers think. So far most believed me to be accurate if a bit harsh. And in an election, especially for President, I think that is just right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How does media bias affect Presidential election by david conaway</title>
		<link>http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/22/how-does-media-bias-affect-presidential-election/comment-page-1/#comment-4228</link>
		<dc:creator>david conaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presidentialraceblog.com/2008/10/22/how-does-media-bias-affect-presidential-election/#comment-4228</guid>
		<description>your obviously a republican...
you are being bias... isn't that what you accuse of the media to be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>your obviously a republican&#8230;<br />
you are being bias&#8230; isn&#8217;t that what you accuse of the media to be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

